Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop .Discuss bọth views and give your own opinion.
Economic development has been capturing a great deal of public attention in recent decades due to its ramifications on both humans’ living standards and environment. Despite its benefits of addressing poverty and hunger, economic growth could be fraught with more environmental drawbacks.
On the one hand, it is true that a better economy could put an end to poverty and hunger. Frist, the developed economy means higher disbursements on agricultural sector. This would feed into reliable crop-yeilds and increased productivity, saving many lives from the cycle of food shortages. Second, economic growth correlates with the rise in employment opportunities for citizens especially low-class ones stemming from the installments of industrial parks and outsourcing activities. Consequently, this would ensure stable payments, thereby helping individuals escape from chronic poverty.
On the other hand, economy would develop at the expenses of environmental destruction. First, this pattern could come at the costs of the mushrooming of manufacturing factories and delivery vehicles, emitting noxious fumes. It is proved that the higher concentrations of carbon dioxide and CFCs in the atmospphere must be inevitable, making citizens more susceptible to irreversable diseases including tuberculosis or lung cancer. In addition, the economic growth correlates with the overconsumption of resources for energy or trading. This acts as an incentive for the overexploitation of national elements, shaking the environmental equilibrium and decelerating the rehabilitation.
In conclusion, humans could not prioritize economic growth over environmental balance. This would result in the consequence of environmenal deterioration,which directly affects human health adversely in the long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...onsequence of environmenal deterioration,which directly affects human health adversely...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13438735178 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51322704913 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9618468531 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131817089252 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480477829028 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575483932083 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849141318521 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267549149214 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.98 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.