Some people say that humanitarian subjects such as philosophy, history and literature that people study in universities have no value for their future career. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples.
The issue of whether humanitarian subjects is worthwhile to students' future career or not has become a contentious issue. Despite the arguments of some people that courses related to humanitarian are wasting the students' time due to the irrelevant knowledge, it is my personal belief that such subjects are able to facilitate them in the workplace. Two of principal reasons for this are as follows.
For a start, learning on humanitarian subjects facilitate the youth to identify the mistakes and prevent it in the future. subjects such as history, philosophy, literature are mainly put concentration on the past events, therefore, some may advocate that focusing on the previous have no value for youngsters' future development. However, it is of paramount importance for us to notice that studying these courses can help people to learn from the past and avoid to do that mistakes again in the future. For instance, philosophy always concerns about human's behaviors, it allows people to reflect themselves and work carefully in the workplace. The value of humanitarian subjects should not be ignored and they should be preserved in order to educate the students.
Moreover, humanitarian subjects is of crucial importance to enhance the quality of human and foster the improvement of society. The popularity of classic literatures is in the descendant which reveals that people are not well cultured now. If we abandon the related subjects, the situation will get worse and the society can hardly be enhanced as everyone does not have sufficient intension. many theories are invented by someone who studied philosophy. For instance, Plato's creations have been treated as the foundation of many theories in science and arts. therefore, the above-mentioned subjects are valuable to be taught to the students for future advances.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm that humanitarian subjects are worthwhile to be preserved. Not only do they facilitate in the future workplace, but they also provide foundation for many discoveries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Subjects
... mistakes and prevent it in the future. subjects such as history, philosophy, literature...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid doing'.
Suggestion: avoid doing
... help people to learn from the past and avoid to do that mistakes again in the future. For ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 393, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...one does not have sufficient intension. many theories are invented by someone who st...
^^^^
Line 9, column 561, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... of many theories in science and arts. therefore, the above-mentioned subjects are valua...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37770897833 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02224275173 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53560371517 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5372035494 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5625 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282133263753 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853631516294 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420560204859 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165080302394 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543738429744 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.