Some people say that instead of seeing the internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world-wide, we should be concerned about the effect this is having on social interaction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
The internet has opened up new methods of communication across the globe. However, some people are worried about the impact this is having on our daily lives. Personally, I think the internet has a detrimental effect on how we socially interact.
I agree that the internet has improved communication in a number of ways. In the modern age families and friends are spread world-wide. Without the advent of email it would be extremely difficult to keep in touch with our peers. For example, in my own experience, my best friend lives in Canada and without email we would have to converse via expensive international telephone calls or letter writing which in turn would mean no instant messaging and a delay in relaying potentially important information.
Nevertheless, the effects of the internet have not been entirely positive. Modern forms of interaction mean that many people feel traditional methods of communication, such as letter writing and conversational skills, are being neglected. This may mean a reduction in the ability of people to socially interact with each other.
Also, the internet can act as an omnipresent distraction. For example, always present instant messaging and social media can be a distraction at home or in the office and can draw a user's attention away from interacting with individuals around them.
In conclusion, I agree that a number of people should be concerned about the effect the internet is having on our ability to interact with one another and this may be damaging to individuals and society in the future if not addressed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
...at home or in the office and can draw a users attention away from interacting with in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12790697674 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98437782913 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3159305272 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.769230769 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29887849805 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108241998135 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696449898691 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174193940986 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947115604274 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.