Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
These days, the environmental problem has aroused by people’s discussion. While the loss of plants and animals is supposed as the dominant issue in the belief of some people, I take the view that there are much more significant and emergency problems.
Advocates of the view about the most crucial issue belonging to the lack of plants and animals argue their essential role on the environment. Indeed, these species play a significant role in stabilizing the ecosystem since they are parts of the food chain. That means if they die, the natural environment will be spoiled tremendously. Nevertheless, they, especially bushes of trees, also do tasks to keep the environment fresh and healthy thanks to their capacity to absorb the harmful fumes and prevent floods. In the south of Viet Nam, for instance, inhabitants usually experience several severe floods per annum due to the shortage of trees living along river banks.
However, in my favor of the idea supporting for more emergency of other problems, there are a plethora of reasons to support this idea. First, the shortage of trees or animals is not the origin, which could stem from other issues. Therefore, instead of focusing on this problem, we need to find and deal with primary pollution sources such as the exhausted gasses from vehicles and industrial zones. Emitting acid gases is the most compelling evidence supporting this view, which not only results in water and air pollution but also skills animals and trees. Second, in comparison with solving the shortage species, enhancing the awareness for mankind is better due to all of those originating from the actions of people. Attempts to solve the lack of species like plants and animals or other problems are prone to be pointless if people do not stop doing negatively for nature.
All in all, we can not deny both sides are well-grounded. In my opinion, to deal with environmental problems more effectively, I suggest that we should concentrate on core issues in lieu of focus too much on the lack of trees and animals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01461988304 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72462064807 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6613441807 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190919209083 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612055469567 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616379164186 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131172110187 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723943625475 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.