Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree

Some folks hold that music is the most efficient alternative for togetherness of people of different heritages, cultures and traditions. Personally, i do not completely agree with this notion as it is not true for everyone, yet for most of the people it does so.

There are various ways which causes people from different backgrounds to come together owing to music. However, the most conspicuous one is due to globalization. Globalisation have been around for a while now and have had more than enough effect on our living. Therefore, masses nowadays have access to all the possible products which are international such as food, brands of clothes and most importantly music. Hence, it causes people to know more and more about international celebrities (singers) like Justin Bieber, Ed shreeran etc. Furthermore, people who bare the same interests like in music get along with other people frequently and therefore they come together.

On the other hand, this should not be stereotyped for all the people as someone's orthodox thinking cannot be altered. Some can be of old perception and may not embrace the current changes and that's why they should not be expected to come along with others. Moreover, such people may want to stick to their old appealing music in comparison with the foreign music for example. However, still all in all it's true that for the majority of people around the globe as they have same choices.

In conclusion, while it is certainly true that music leaves no difference in the listeners of it, yet we cannot symbolise it for everyone.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s, cultures and traditions. Personally, i do not completely agree with this notio...
^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...may not embrace the current changes and thats why they should not be expected to come...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c for example. However, still all in all its true that for the majority of people...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74866406251 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564885496183 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9127493514 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.769230769 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255173822315 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976354160398 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889936709386 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156620164033 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757158347567 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.