To decrease tensions between countries, expanding international organizations has been one of the most prominent challenges for governments and people during the history. Hence, international Olympic committee have been established more than 100 years ago to develop countries connections by utilize sports competitive potential.
Some international social experts believe that Olympic Games have big roles in global relationships. They emphasize that in addition to competitive atmosphere, these tournaments cause to increase communications between cultures undoubtedly. During Olympics holding time, people from participated countries neglect their fundamental issues and pay attention to these competitions. These experts think that this frequent competitions have some economical influences for host countries because of increasing tourists and visitors during holding time. Comprehensive researches in last 3 periods of Olympic Games illustrated that amount of visitors in host countries increased more than 40% on average in Olympic years.
On the other hand, some other international expert think that except of sport value Olympic Games don’t have any effect in world`s events. They believe that for majority of people in all over the world because of some basic problems in economy and social issues, these competitions don’t have any importance absolutely. In their opinion, even these competitions increase spending money in host countries and lead to some economic issues for them.
In conclusion, according to statistics, advantages of Olympic Games were more than disadvantages especially for host countries. It is undeniable that these tournaments have big influences in social and cultural communications among countries and their athletes. I think these competitions achieved their main target. I believe that governments and organizations should devise some appropriate plans like Olympic Games to decrease and maybe eliminate conflicts between nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: increasing
...ive atmosphere, these tournaments cause to increase communications between cultures undoubt...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, may, so, i think, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11428571429 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17914120094 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1679267315 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192670161417 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749265068562 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592740051941 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125029170452 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558951757461 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.