Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers. Do you agree or disagree?
Communication is very crucial in modern people's lives. It delivers knowledge and information based on real-world occurrences that occur every day. Whether we should continue to print newsletters on paper or perpetuating antiquated communication techniques has been a point of contention since the beginning. Personally, I support the notion of moving digital and will explain why in the following lines.
First, when new generations arrive, they spend more time online rather than reading newspapers. For example, everyone has a mobile phone and spends time monitoring social concerns while going about their everyday activities. - daily duties such as waiting for a bus or train, travelling somewhere, standing in line, and so on. Most individuals cannot find time to read the news by sitting in one location or carrying many items with them in our hectic world. Modern individuals are profoundly impacted by the processes of progress, modernization, and globalization as they go forward. They see reading printed newspapers as antiquated and tedious. We must move with the times or risk falling behind in this fast-paced world.
Furthermore, not only is digital being used to save time, but it is also being fairly useful to the environment. By using alternate ways, we can save countless trees from destruction and lessen our reliance on paper. Many people may have access to the internet for free or at a low cost. We can make a lot of money by investing in a single source rather than investing in several sources with limited returns.
In conclusion, our children and grandchildren require several resources to thrive on our earth. We owe it to them to give them with the same basic heritage amenities as our forefathers in order to make their life simpler and more pleasant. It will be the nicest present we could give them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12666666667 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89646509552 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0002572005 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4444444444 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0957740079903 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299161633969 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364984263331 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568514007002 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210082301999 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.