Some people store personal and private information online, including banking, contacts, and addresses. Is it a positive or negative trend?
in this digital era, myriad online social media sites appear in order to provide a range of the convenience of the Internet such as free education, no fee beneficial website, or received online coaching tutorials earning money with less effort. Besides that, providing personal identity was inevitable, even really private information like a bank account, addresses, to having permission access to launch the utilities available that the website designer supplies it for you. From my perspective, this tendency is considered a negative behavior as it makes people more and more run a risk of being victimized by hi-tech crimes.
To begin with the personal financial effect, you might be experienced banking account theft, directly harmful to your domestic life. In detail, data relating to your phone number, date of birth, email address are principally required to create an online account on most social media platforms. instead of helping you protect, those types of sites hack and thieve data and pass it to the three parties to get profit from it. furthermore, it not only a threat for yourself but also being a cheat for your relative. In case that, the con men using identity to force your parents to transfer money into your being stolen account. Criminals can use the information to get more information from you to obtain their stolen purpose. Hackers are continuously looking for manners to get into your personal finances to implement illegal behavior and harm you non-stop.
Apart from scams, over-posting personal data on social networking sites also resulting in the stolen information. Specifically, some social platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter...that display status, life updates, or even your accommodation, relationship, usually being published. This kind of information will support the illegal conduct of criminals. For instance, your yesterday image, which shows the place you arrived or who you go with, now can become the perfect source for fraud and scam acts. Disclosure of excessive personal online information leads you to a serious circumstance that being followed and intimidated by strangers. In addition, to avoid the danger of con men, stop publishing every part of your life or anything that occurs in your life on the network. Make sure that you just selectively posted instead of your entire life.
To sum up, providing private information on the Internet could potentially be harmful to users.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
in this digital era, myriad online socia...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
in this digital era, myriad online social ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of being victimized by hi-tech crimes. To begin with the personal financial eff...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
...account on most social media platforms. instead of helping you protect, those types of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llegal behavior and harm you non-stop. Apart from scams, over-posting personal ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly posted instead of your entire life. To sum up, providing private information...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, look, really, so, apart from, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29820051414 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81476798834 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601542416452 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9951688284 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139306038871 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450577289028 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400862147056 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939899960774 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028066157181 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.