Some people think adults should learn practical skills by themselves, while others think they should learn with teachers in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this modern society of lifelong learning, adults also need to learn to cope with this changing world. There is a debate that adults should learn by themselves or through teachers’ help. In my point of view, both methods have their pros and cons, but self -learning would be a better idea for further development.
Self-learning means learners could have a flexible timetable which is important for adults who have limited time, Self-learning allows adults to fit learning into their existing schedules or make lesser changes to their lifestyles. There's no real ability to work full-time when attending college, but it's possible if you can schedule your studies in the evenings and during the weekends. However, There are usually no professionals to guide you when you self-learn, there's no one to approach personally and discuss your concerns and thoughts with which means self-learners are easily to make basic mistakes because they lack of input from trainers.
Learning practical skills under teachers’ supervision could be a more efficient and systematic way, because teachers can immediately identify the mistakes that students made and direct them back on the right track. Therefore, students can avoid unnecessary detours which would help students avoid wasting money and time. Furthermore, the benefits of a mentor go beyond raw information. Good mentors show us the reasons behind what they do. They can give us the "why" that's always so important. Mentors also serve as professional role models and induce leaners’ potentials. In this case, adults would benefit from teachers.
In conclusion, encouraging adults to learn independently is one of the methods to learn practical skills. But receiving guidance from teachers is a better strategy for adults to learn in a more systematic way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
...ake lesser changes to their lifestyles. Theres no real ability to work full-time when ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...onals to guide you when you self-learn, theres no one to approach personally and discu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...o. They can give us the 'why' thats always so important. Mentors also serve...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37762237762 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88013426043 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625874125874 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3598908914 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.533333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259228448066 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852860471534 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786130152049 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167431868904 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583462798502 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.