Some people think adults should learn practical skills by themselves, while others think they should learn from teachers. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Perspectives about the approach of learning practical skills are varied between people. In my opinion, adults should resort to steroids in order to obtain those skills from teachers.
On the one hand, learning practical skills independently is good for adults. The most important reason is that mature people can have high self-esteem and they should learn by themselves to avoid some problems which involve personal issues. In particular, they might be annoyed when someone reminds or trains them. Moreover, teachers just show the theory because they cannot practice on adults’ behalf and those skills need to do more than study, so only they can teach easily practice skills for them. Furthermore, adults are no longer young to teach like students because they have vast knowledge and individual opinions.
On the other hand, teachers play crucial roles when humans need to learn something and practical skills are not exceptions. In the first place, teachers who have numerous experiences will show us right ways to study. In reality, people may meet difficult challenges from starting new things and teachers or professors are good choices to give advices. In the second place, it wastes too much time on learning themselves and adults do not have time as much as adolescents. For example, when they land a job, they have to spend most time on doing works within necessary skills such as practice. However, they cannot learn the skills in limited time without supports from teachers or even colleagues. The last reason is that people always say: “ A young ox learns to plow from an older one” and these words are still transmitted until now by word of mouth.
In a nutshell, while both views bring benefits to adults in having good practical skills, I still tend towards the viewpoint that teachers are better for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ssors are good choices to give advices. In the second place, it wastes too much ti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, while, for example, in particular, such as, in my opinion, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10561056106 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50077921392 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594059405941 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3565617216 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.133333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2666666667 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319183039431 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105766682203 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580966044073 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199609315481 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567080793453 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.