Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in future, such as science and technology. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
It is certainly true that freedom should be given to the university student for what they like to study. It is often argued that this is a positive development in the student life, whilst other disagree and think that more options should not be provided to student for studying as limit their subject to science and technology so that it will be fruitful in future. This essay agrees that if the university student are provided with more options then more specialized and skilled manpower will come out as a result. This essay will discuss both point of view.
It is clear that the options in subject helps student to do best on it and enhance their knowledge in interested field. Moreover, student will be more motivated to study and performed their task effectively. It is therefore agreed that options between various subject in university student life helps them to develop their mind conceptually and boost confidence level to do something innovatively on the subject they have choose in coming future. For example, according to research of 2015 conducted by “Tribhuwan University” Nepal Board of Education showed that number of passed student had increased after providing alternatives for student to study.
However, many disagree and feel that more options deprives people from hardworking whilst they may lack interest to study. It directly hampers on career development as well so subject should be limited and student should allowed to study science and technology which helps student to develop their personality and career. Despite this, career development is still possible in choosing various subject like people have freedom to choose science and technology in option which will be useful in future and this essay disagree more options should not be provided. For instance, this is most evident in my country that nowadays according to talent and understanding skills student are choosing subject and able to make their own unique identity in crowd.
In conclusion, while the benefit of freedom in selecting subject helps student to grab quality knowledge whereas on the other hand it may makes student quite careless about study. At last, I personally think that more options in university life means more opportunities in coming future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... technology so that it will be fruitful in future. This essay agrees that if the universi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
... student are provided with more options then more specialized and skilled manpower w...
^^^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...g innovatively on the subject they have choose in coming future. For example, accordin...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...s according to talent and understanding skills student are choosing subject and able t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 690, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to subject'
Suggestion: to subject
...derstanding skills student are choosing subject and able to make their own unique ident...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21917808219 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70352244115 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479452054795 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2700722365 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.071428571 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317433335218 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125931341512 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817993561533 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208255248107 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866498225155 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.