Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Opinions differ on whether students are afforded the right to learn what they really want or universities need to encourage them study subjects that have high practical application in the work later. Personally, I think both views are plausible as each has its own merits.
It is certainly true that allow students to choose comfortably their majors would rather than force them. In other words, universities should create advantageous conditions to promote their passions because they also benefit from that. Besides, creative thinking skills are estimated as a crucial ingredient in work, therefore, who had accomplished courses with subjects they like often have more opportunities to get a good job by breakthrough thinking. Last but not least, whether they are the upper or the lower class in society, in addition to supplement about material, spirit is indispensable in demand of humans, subjects are related to art such as music, drawing or action also need to be encouraged.
However, there are other reasons to explain why students should concern to subjects involved to science or technology. Firstly, students easily access hot fields in the future depend on extensive knowledge which is covered by universities. Secondly, their quality of life is markedly improved through a high salary because jobs about studying science and technology are necessary in the 4.0 era. Finally, the government ascertains what sources of labor are vital to stimulate development country, therefore, through the universities to guide students to choose subjects useful in the future also a good way to solve knowledge and skill gaps on their doorstep.
In conclusion, I believe that in addition to forcing students to learn primary subjects, there are clearly further benefits when allowing them to comfortable choose what they like.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40069686411 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83424580606 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8605818231 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.909090909 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4545454545 7.06120827912 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308409973722 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999396922724 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353481098843 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165199733676 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281366423453 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.