Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Whether students should have freedom of choices over what they are going to learn during their tertiary years or should they be obliged to study certain technical subjects assigned by the university becomes a widely debated issue. In this essay, I will proclaim both arguments, followed by my personal view.
The former opinion of allowing students to study whatever they want is agreeable for the following reasons. Indeed the university students are not adolescents anymore, who can sometimes be wishy-washy. Majority of them are certain about their passion and are motivated to pursue them. The academic outputs will be astonishing if the youths were given chances to follow their dream. For instance, a young man who is passionate about literature can feel devastated when he is forced to study engineering. Allowing the students to choose their interested majors for the first two university years is also an appealing idea. By doing so, while those who know their passion will be more immersed in their subject matters, those who are not sure with their calling will have a chance to reconsider their choice. In addition, society is not evolving with just only scientists or technicians, it is also decorated with artists and authors. Letting the youths choose a wide range of subject matters will not only their courage to take on any challenges be enhanced, but also their inspiration to adept in their respective fields be enhanced; not just living their lives blindly for a salary-oriented career.
On the contrary, the latter opinion highlights the responsibility of higher education to prepare the university students for practical work in the future. In this era of information, the subjects such as accounting of basic computer skills are very much essential for every profession. By providing these assets as compulsory majors in the syllabus, the juveniles will be proficient and ready for the actual employees' environment as soon as they are graduated. Also, a predefined curriculum will help the students to be focused and committed to their own track since they can be considered as inexperienced in practicing "self-control".
To sum up, both the arguments have pros and cons and the rest is up to the choice of the university. Personally I believe that certain freedom should be granted to the students: giving a space to develop their passionate field while a complete freedom to the selection of subjects is not a wise option to consider.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...is agreeable for the following reasons. Indeed the university students are not adolesc...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... be proficient and ready for the actual employees environment as soon as they are graduat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'complete freedom'.
Suggestion: complete freedom
...to develop their passionate field while a complete freedom to the selection of subjects is not a w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...jects is not a wise option to consider.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, such as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1815920398 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99041499909 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549751243781 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1572106022 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.529411765 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6470588235 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280890630098 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883645555479 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638993829366 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181151738757 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640545778247 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.