Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance"-Socrates. The prompt asserts two divergent opinions where the first one states that certain demogrpahic considers that university students should study what they want and the other opinion is that they should study practical courses. In my opinion, there are advantages and disadvantages of each of the opinions, there should be an amalgamation of the the viewpoints.
First of all, the first viewpoint, the university students should be able to have the oppurtunity to take whatever courses they want. This will give the students a chance to explore all of their desired avenues of knowledge. For example, a mathematics or theoretical physics student may want to take up a course in history or literature out of sheer curiosity or maybe a background passion of these humanities courses. These students will have the chance to study these courses which are not even remotely related to their majors. Furthermore, some other courses such as philosophy course or economics courses may even have beneficial attributes to the students. Because, at first we had only philosophy as a subject which eventually parted into physics, chemistry, astronomy, and mathematics. So, a theoretical physics students may have the ability to explore the past philosphies which were closely related to science. And, as many graduate mathematics students study finances and economics, it would be advantageous for them to have a somewhat foreground about them by studying a rudimentary course about economics.
Secondly, the latter opinion, there should be an intransigent courses available to the students, and there should be only pragmatic courses which are helpful in real life. This opinion also does have merits, as the job market at present is getting more and more competetive. It is wise to have courses more oritented towards jobs than abstract knowledges. Moreover, as we are leaning towards a more techonlogically advanced society where technology and business related jobs are flourishing. Then, it should be prudent to have basic technological and business related courses be mandatory to all the subjects. For example, all most in all corporate jobs, it is a must to have knowledge about Microsoft Excel, spreadsheets, and slack. A candidate with zero knowledge about these softwares has lesser chances of getting a job in the real world. Hence, these courses are necessary.
However, universities siding with only one of the opinions may lead to a detrimental result. As, the two opinions are on the two opposite extremes of a same spectrum. It would be wise to have a mixture of these two. Students should have the indepence to choose what they want, if they want to take up various courses or want to stick to the pragmatic courses.
In conclusion, both of the opinions has their own merits and demerits. None of the opinions can be disregarded, only by amalgamtion we can move forward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ons, there should be an amalgamation of the the viewpoints. First of all, the first...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ons, there should be an amalgamation of the the viewpoints. First of all, the first...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'physics'' or 'physic's'?
Suggestion: physics'; physic's
...r example, a mathematics or theoretical physics student may want to take up a course in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...terature out of sheer curiosity or maybe a background passion of these humanities...
^^
Line 3, column 1038, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('somewhat') instead an adjective, or a noun ('foreground') instead of another adjective.
... would be advantageous for them to have a somewhat foreground about them by studying a rudimentary co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ically advanced society where technology and business related jobs are flourishin...
^^
Line 5, column 665, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...all most in all corporate jobs, it is a must to have knowledge about Microsoft Excel, s...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nions may lead to a detrimental result. As, the two opinions are on the two opposi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2490.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 477.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22012578616 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04512948418 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473794549266 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 797.4 506.74238477 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.697633047 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.08 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.32 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299654911317 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830844523414 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715619028292 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168955791067 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647130326422 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.