Some people think children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV at both home and school. To what extend do you agree and disagree?

Some people believe that watching TV can help children to learn effectively, so they need to be encouraged to watch TV, I disagree to the point that learning can be made effective by watching.

Firstly, there are many adverse effects in watching TV . For instance if a pupil is give permission to watch TV at school and home, it is better if he uses that time to view the programs which improves his education instead he spends time on watching programs which are interesting to them but not necessary for learning purpose such as cartoons, serials etc. These programs will have serious impact on his studies because children are immature they don't know the worse effects of these activities.

Another point to consider is including sports in school activities can make a student to refine his performance in studies. As an example, if children are encouraged to watch TV in school at leisure time as a result they don't have any physical exercise to the body which in turn may cause health problems such as obesity. In addition to that children may also get vision issues such as farsightedness and nearsightedness . The best way to overcome these issues is by playing games or involving in other physical activities.

In conclusion, to help students learn effectively by using TV, parental care need to be taken in watching it such as insisting children to watch educational related channels, allowing them to watch only for a short period of time, encouraging their children to play outdoor games will also help to relieve stress therefore they can learn effectively.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... are many adverse effects in watching TV . For instance if a pupil is give permiss...
^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...dies because children are immature they dont know the worse effects of these activit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...school at leisure time as a result they dont have any physical exercise to the body ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ch as farsightedness and nearsightedness . The best way to overcome these issues i...
^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...allowing them to watch only for a short period of time, encouraging their children to play out...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95094339623 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77523288156 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562264150943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.4835654403 49.4020404114 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.777777778 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5555555556 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416803914853 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170845287436 0.084324248473 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150998346948 0.0667982634062 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291995613739 0.151304729494 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132220958033 0.056905535591 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.