Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organization, while others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Feasible solutions to support developing or underdeveloped countries have been a highly debated topic recently. While financial aid is plausible in some people’s opinions, others argue that practical aid and advice is preferable. While there is a strong case for former, I am convinced that the latter approach is more effective as a solution to long-term problems and social progress of a nation.
It is an obvious fallacy to consider supplying direct financial aid as a viable method to deal with economic issues. Advocates of this view would argue that this kind of suppliment offers flexibility allowing the governments to invest the money in different aspect of life. However, this reasoning is irrational since those types of bandwagon are usually limited and therefore, can only be act as a short-term solution. Another rationale would be that as direct monetary resources can be transfer via the Internet with just one click, illegal activities such as corruption and Internet fraud may take place.
Meanwhile, there are various reasons why I agree that practical aid and advice may be more instrumental as long-term solution than the aforementioned approach. Firstly, it can enable the receiving countries to reduce poverty and other econimic issue. For example, they can provide citizens in countries such as Cambodia and Indonesia with the basic necessities such as housing, food and medical care thereby. An additional result of this policy is that since local people can make ends meet with the suppliment of global organizations, there is no need for committing illegal actions. Furthermore, these support are particularly important and play a vital role in rebuilding countries in the event of natural disasters such as the Aceh tsunami in 2005. Finally, by offering workers with vocational training courses and students with scholarship, we can create a more knowledgable workforce in the future, fostering economic productivity and becoming self-reliant.
In conclusion, I am completely convinced that practical aid and advice such as technology transfer could considerably contribute to the resolution of developing countries rather than direct monetary resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...such as Cambodia and Indonesia with the basic necessities such as housing, food and medical care ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52522255193 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05156487432 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593471810089 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3770361178 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156731489733 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584239152054 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742895703654 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109353411217 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632021349716 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.