Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that people have different opinions about measures to assist poor nations. While some people think that financial support from international bodies is essential for those countries, I would argue that practical aid and advice are more effective assistance.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial aid has a positive impact on developing countries combat starvation and poverty. Firstly, external monetary flow from international investment enables local and national authorities to improve infrastructure by upgrading and expanding public transport provision, building more interstate roads and investing in hospital facilities. As a result, thanks to the overwhelming support, it is convenient for citizens in those place to avoid traffic congestion or minimize the risk of disease. Secondly, foreign cash injections make a great contribution to creating more job for struggle residents living in rural areas or harsh conditions. If financial aids from authorities focus on developing a wide range of different jobs in the society, especially in poor countries, people who have whether or not degree are able to earn money to make end meets.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that practical aid and advice are effective solutions to maintain sustainable growth in the long-term. Firstly, undeveloped nations need experts in the field of science, law, and medicine in order to encourage their development. However, scientists, lawyers, and doctors can only be trained and professional and systematic education and training programs are therefore more practice and suitable in the context of poor countries. Secondly, without this funding, the poor will be incapable of maintaining the economic development and independence. Therefore, it is better to give proper advice and guidance by providing opportunities for students from developing countries to learn comprehensive knowledge and experience from prosperous ones. For example, some prestigious Japanese universities offer a large number of scholarships for million of students in the area to enrich their professional understanding.
In conclusion, although additional funding to support poor nations is not a sustainable solution, it seems to me that advice and practical aid are better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 832, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ally in poor countries, people who have whether or not degree are able to earn money to make e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 839, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...prestigious Japanese universities offer a large number of scholarships for million of students in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 874, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ffer a large number of scholarships for million of students in the area to enrich their...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70294117647 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17501464455 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7175267821 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256661296293 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786854118794 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750018796983 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155843174235 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071397828314 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.