Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve others, however, believe that the problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take action?
The issue of environmental protection has been discussed for many years as an essential global fact. Today, although some say solving environmental problems is not as much as persons ‘ability, others, included myself, believe that individuals can play undeniable role in this ground.
In some opinion, since every person is just as a single component of the society, it is not practical to handle surrounded environmental difficulties by them. In fact, the current problems have been created by different factors and to solve them, all these elements should be managed. For instance, Global warming is one of the most threatening events which is occurring. This group of people thinks decreasing carbon dioxide emission is out of our control because this high portion of this issue is as a result of climate changes.
On the other hand, many other people reject the first group idea. According to this group, to decline environmental difficulties, individuals are extremely beneficial. The society is consisted of these single elements which are able to damage environment by their overuse activities. To illustrate this view, let me bring an example. Deforestation is one of the increasing problems in our current world. In the other words, population growth caused people to devote a large portion of the lands to build houses. So, in order to provide their needed space, it is essential to cut the trees and plants. Whereas, deforestation is the clearing of trees without replanting them, people can compensate this detriment by planting another tree in different landscape. In this way they can help to overcome deforestation as an important part of environmental issues.
In conclusion, I think all people around the world has effective responsibility to manage their activity without pushing environment is trouble. In addition, they can encourage each other to prevent territory destroying activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...without pushing environment is trouble. In addition, they can encourage each other...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37541528239 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04799487111 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58803986711 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3631759948 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1764705882 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204026932599 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555991629235 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652245767102 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129724140323 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803391194551 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.