Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The environmental problems are the concerning topic these days, few people believed that it should be eradicated globally, where others agree that the individual country is responsible for fixing it themselves. In my perspective, trying in small chunks gives great effort than as a one. This essay will discuss both of the views.
First, of the all, the problems like pollution, CO2 emission, greenhouse effect are to be concerned in the global scope,
even the large organization can reduce those effects in huge ratio. If the organization with high influence planned an agenda then its effectiveness increased. The funds they raised and spend can innovate the greater changes in compared with self nations. There are many examples that uniting solve the more complex problem also help weaker countries to be actively involved in environmental problems. Though being a group fixes and plan differently than alone but when they do alone they try lots of approaches and be more effective than a single approach.
Secondly, If the global plan fails the whole of the world solution is failed, so every nation can try different methods which can lead to a different conclusion. We can select one of the best approaches from them and implement in all of the countries, which can maximize the solution level. Like America, China and other developing nations have an impact on global warming and pollution, these countries are industrially well centered and releases harmful gas to the atmosphere because of which small nations are being affected. They are spending a large percentage of their economy themselves with different plans like planting trees, maintaining greenery, so it helps the small nation to learn from them and implement with low budget.
In conclusion, environmental problems are a unambiguous problem and leading us backward. So, grouping the nations and planning to solve about the harmful environmental problems is not the solution, in my approach trying individually give them a better solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are to be concerned in the global scope, even the large organization can reduce t...
^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...can reduce those effects in huge ratio. If the organization with high influence pl...
^^
Line 6, column 231, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...t approaches from them and implement in all of the countries, which can maximize the solut...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 43, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... conclusion, environmental problems are a unambiguous problem and leading us back...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27950310559 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83723145598 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60248447205 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0761144539 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215355840158 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742446166628 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499080935097 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129664101953 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541846778977 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.