Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, authorities put more emphasis on arts and cultural-related things. Some things say that government funding needs to stop using in arts and cultural stuff, others think it is beneficial. In this essay, I will explain both views of people and why I think spending money on arts has many benefits.
Those who think that the funding of the higher authority on arts and historical traditions must be stopped because it saves more money and will use to build more hospitals, parks, schools, and many more. This may lead to having better services for citizens. In 2010, for example, the governing panel of china passed a law about allocating more checks to build infrastructures such as medical and learning places and they cut all spending on arts due to this, people had greater access to hospitals and classrooms when they needed. A survey has shown this in 2015. Hence, the more accessible places such as learning places and doctors people have, the more they will be satisfied.
On the other hand, others and I, however, think spending a great number of money on art and culture has advantages for people as well as tourism. When the governing people give more focus to arts and museums, it attracts many people across from national and international locations. This may result in the overall tourism’ earning and people's knowledge about other traditional methods. In Nepal, the government earned mostly from historical places and exhibitions, so they had a special place for these places in their national budget. Ultimately, although spending more money on other things provides benefits, arts and culture have more advantages than it.
In conclusion, people had more schools and hospitals when the ruling party cut their funding on arts and culture, but if they spend on these places, it will generate a source of money for them as well. In my words, despite spending money on making more buildings, it has not many advantages that arts and culture provide to people as well as the economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding money on arts has many benefits. Those who think that the funding of the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, well, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99107142857 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60741294263 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508928571429 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6490124952 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273737527279 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109198216352 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707795477546 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197535676555 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740950409666 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.