It’s true that many people think we should promote some measures to decrease the pollution to our environment as well as to improve housing condition to improve people’s quality of life. In my opinion, I agree that our public authorities should take more responsibilities to those issues.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why our governments could be the major role into mitigating these social concerns. Firstly, the local councils can’t emphasize the destructive damages caused by air pollution, sewage emission from factories, exhaust fumes and soil erosion too much. Therefore, to face with these challenges, the relevant steps could be imposed to solve these problems from regulation and law departments. For example, only limited number of private vehicles could be allowed to traverse into city areas and sewage emission from manufactures have to obey the rules and standards before ejected into rivers. If these laws functioned well in a wide range supervision, the negative effects from human activities could be sharply reduced and controlled to protect our environment.
On the other hand, governments are also playing vital roles to enhancing the living rights to the people by carrying out some housing projects. There are more and more young people rush into the big cities for seeking better career chances and public facilities. However, most of those who just entered the societies couldn’t afford the expensive houses or apartments. To tackle with the risk of increasing possibilities of illnesses and disease due to poor living conditions, governments should introduce some programs like low-rent housing or affordable housing. As a result, by living into a stable private space, people are more like to stay healthy, mentally and physically.
In conclusion, I deem that our governments are the crucial keys to the success in the achievements of the social welfare and sustainable environmental development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stay healthy, mentally and physically. In conclusion, I deem that our governmen...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46710526316 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94584076951 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8090705941 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.846153846 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200089043955 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652146371129 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583186850275 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118193616596 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722655701125 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.