Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Several members of society assert that the expenditure of tax money on arts sector is futile and the nation’s capital ought to be expended on other sections of community. Personally, I concur with this notion to some extent as I opine that it is the onus of government to allocate funds on all domains effectively sans prejudice.
To commence with, why spending or arts is important? The cogent reasons is that arts, specifically folk arts, are the salient source of the culture and heritage of a nation. If authorities halt the funding to these sectors, then it might lead to indelible loss of the traditions and customs of a nation as well as people might fail to attain the information about their past mores. Further, arts, in the form of architecture and paintings, foster the tourism industry of a country as plethora of tourists typically visit a region to admire its cultural legacy; however, if regime eschew providing monetary aid to these areas, it will adversely impact the touristry and economy of the nation. This can be efficaciously illustrated by the fact that tourism industry accounts for the third largest contribution to the GDP in Canada. Hence, arts sector is indispensable part of the society and nation.
On the flip side, other divisions of society, such as education and medical area, are also prominent because for the overall growth of any realm, it is vital for its dwellers to be properly educated and healthy. Ergo, if these zones are undeveloped, then it would be injudicious for the supremacy to spend money on arts as arts section has no significant relation with the welfare of people. For instance, in European nations, the amenity of education as well as healthcare facilities are complimentary for all citizens. As a consequence, Europe dominates other countries in terms of the highest literacy rate and life expectancy.
Laconically, even though arts sector is imperative for nation, especially for the perpetuity of its cultural values and for tourism industry, other sectors also hold their significance for its adequate advancement. Therefore, I contend that the leaders should flourish all sectors of the civilization uniformly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...rt that the expenditure of tax money on arts sector is futile and the nation’s capit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, third, well, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14325842697 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91988268118 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5364441376 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.785714286 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113604887433 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040578299148 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455708131776 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778063251763 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593644126938 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.