Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
A number of people have the viewpoint that the authorities investing money in innovative artisans are unnecessary. However, I strongly believed that awarding painters and musicians with the economic rewards should be a highly recommendable strategy for the nation
On the one hand, some argue that instead of spending on talented artists, the source of the economic budget is investing in healthcare infrastructure or the army budget owing to the fact that these people can receive a good pension and benefit from other commercial sources such as street auditions, museum exhibitions,...However, these incomes are not enough motivation for innovative artists to continue pursuing their passions, their ambitions.
On the other hand, sponsoring monetary rewards not only improves the spirits of talented artists but also brings a plethora of benefits to the nation. First, the creative artisans will consolidate their belief about the importance of spiritual cultures if they are invested properly, then their innovative imagination line will be widespread and developed. Therefore, prospering the history and architecture for the future generation is one of the critical missions that the authorities need to protect by promoting creative artists.
In conclusion, in my point of view, the authorities should be the ones who have a decision on the survival of spirits cultures by supplying creative artisans with financial support.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... as street auditions, museum exhibitions,...However, these incomes are not enough ...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...street auditions, museum exhibitions,...However, these incomes are not enough motivatio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 217.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64516129032 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16871131235 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608294930876 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 164.124698527 49.4020404114 332% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 204.166666667 106.682146367 191% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1666666667 20.7667163134 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5 7.06120827912 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208490145044 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872527773005 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057683365587 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124844945242 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323962643984 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.3 13.0946893788 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.02 50.2224549098 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.3001002004 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 30.5 9.78957915832 312% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.