Some people think that having criminal people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree?
Crime education is extremely important in helping young students understand and avoid illegal activities. While it is said that asking unlaw-abiding citizens to share their stories is an effective way to teach them about the risk of crime, I completely disagree with them.
There are various reasons why offenders should not give their speeches in front of the public, particularly school students. One of them is to help them guarantee their private rights. Criminals have to be accused of and pay for their wrongdoings; however, they are able to re-inhabit society. They may struggle with more difficult challenges if other citizens recognize them and steer away from them. Another is that innocent children, who are less likely to have a deep insight into illegal activities and their consequences, have a tendency to idolize or mimic criminals’ actions, increasing the juvenile crime rates in their community. Moreover, parents will disagree with allowing their children to interact with dangerous offenders, regardless of any educational purposes.
Furthermore, there are also many other methods to teach students about crime instead of listening to talks by prisoners. By raising the young generation’s awareness of ethical values and laws, children can realize what is right and wrong before conducting an action. They should be taught about serious consequences and punishment as soon as they commit a crime. In addition, it is noted that each adult should be a good example for the young to imitate. Parents and teachers should be not only important instructors but also supervisors to help students who engage in social evils.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree about allowing people who have been in prison to talk with young generations due to potential problems. People can use different methods when it comes to educating the young about the dangers of crime.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3355704698 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83080692768 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7701172015 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254428321768 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799378972946 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544738428703 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157580930614 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524315820241 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.