Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Advantages and disadvantages of hosting an international sporting event are frequently discussed, dividing people in two categories: who believes this can benefit the country and who considers it just a burden. I personally agree with the first opinion.
Countries compete over the chance of hosting such event, this itself is self-explanatory of how important it is. First of all, when such event takes place, it involves not only athletes, but spectators too. This results in a booming rate of tourism, with a growth in demand for accommodations. Hotels are not the only ones who take advantage from this: tourists tend to spend more money when on vacation, so restaurants will surely be more crowded. Furthermore, the specific chosen city will be in the spotlight, being mentioned in magazines and news, gaining visibility as never before.
For example, after the London Olympics, its tourism percentages didn't decrease to its starting point, but still grew.
On the other hand, hosting this kind of event can be challenging. First of all, structures with specific regulations are needed. Often these aren't available, so nations have to build some from scratch. The costs are significant and, if not managed well, the funds might not be sufficient. As a consequence, the government has to pay extra money to be able to ultimate the construction works. Furthermore, after the event is over, a humongous complex of stadium, fields and buildings are left, with no other plan. Repurposing such structures can be hard and the costs of dismantle are considerable.
What happened to the Rio the Janeiro Olympics village is the striking example of this problem: it got abandoned and forgotten.
In my opinion the benefits of hosting an event out-weight the disadvantages, conferring to the country a spike in tourism and visibility that goes beyond the event's duration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ondon Olympics, its tourism percentages didnt decrease to its starting point, but sti...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...fic regulations are needed. Often these arent available, so nations have to build som...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'events'' or 'event's'?
Suggestion: events'; event's
...ism and visibility that goes beyond the events duration.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, well, as to, for example, kind of, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23920265781 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99961918533 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611295681063 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8401141933 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7647058824 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126055919877 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362060767278 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376622594342 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066682030045 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040899433912 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.