Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Nowadays, sports are developed rapidly and there are more sport events day by day, some people believe that host the sport contest is good for home country whilst some people think that it is unmeaningful. I completely agree that it is good to host an gymnastic event and this essay will discuss both of views and give my opinion.
On the one hand, some people (especially sporty people or investors) believe that hosting sport events are useful. It is quiet good to advertise the traditional image of each home country. Some people also suggest that host an event can earn lots of money from tickets, lightsticks or posters. As a case on point, Russia is the World Cup host country in 2018, this event brought a lot of tourists to Russia. While local officials expect as many as 1.5 million visitors, consulting firms put a rather modest figure of only about 500,000 thousand, such a number is still significant because each fan spends about $5,000-8,000 for accommodation, food, souvenirs, entertainment and more. Obviously there are many benefits to hosting a sports competition.
On the other hand, some people think that organizing a sport event cannot give benifits. They believe that these activities are just annoying but not profitable. To illustrate this point, there were many risks, in 2004, Greece thought it would only cost 1.5 billion USD to host the Olympics, but in reality, the amount they had to spend was 10 times higher. However, it is difficult to negate the advantages that sport event bring, there are real economic benefits to those working on construction sites in preparation for an sport compettion.
Conclusively, I totally agree that sport events give many advantages like World Cup profit, enlarge the traditional country images... but there are still small risks such as loss or nuisance.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'events'' or 'event's'?
Suggestion: events'; event's
...eloped rapidly and there are more sport events day by day, some people believe that ho...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ompletely agree that it is good to host an gymnastic event and this essay will dis...
^^
Line 2, column 608, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ignificant because each fan spends about ,000-8,000 for accommodation, food, souve...
^^
Line 2, column 727, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ly there are many benefits to hosting a sports competition. On the other hand, some p...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...n construction sites in preparation for an sport compettion. Conclusively, I tota...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, while, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00660066007 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62756848706 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567656765677 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1972388333 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.357142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42800254024 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136001699988 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127859371417 0.0667982634062 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25888589687 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161828326379 0.056905535591 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.