Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In this era of globalization, the world is considered to be a global village as trade, tourism, politics, films, music, literature, and arts are not restricted within a country’s border. This international business opportunity and cultural exchange surely bring many positive aspects while the negative impacts cannot be ignored as well. This essay delves into these two views and expresses my personal opinion on them.
First, borderless commerce underlines the necessity of an international language. Since the world has become a global village in which people from distinct regions speak the same language, further mutual benefits from transnational trade are closely associated with the disappearance of minor dialects on a global scale. Moreover, the dominance of affluent countries’ cultures has sped up the process of other countries’ cultural disappearance. For example, many teenagers in Vietnam would prefer listening to Korean or American songs to hearing Vietnamese folk music such as Bolero. As a consequence, occident costumes, foods, and lifestyles have gradually penetrated into Vietnamese people’s daily life, taking the place of time-honored values.
However, globalization, the tendency in which countries are growingly reciprocal, is a precious and unprecedented opportunity for an inferior culture to be advertised to the outside world. In the area of flourishing international tourism, a country is given the ability to promote its images in others’ eyes, which results in cultural quintessence including cuisine, costume, and festivals that can be preserved and brought into play.
In conclusion, although the global integration among countries can enrich many of the benefits, it can result in the loss of national identities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 395, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...s into these two views and expresses my personal opinion on them. First, borderless commerce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7816091954 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19047830323 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662835249042 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8754069983 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.181818182 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160586554673 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057555140794 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494097731535 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948230511095 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129777841308 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.