Some people think that an international car-free day is an effective way of reducing air pollution. Others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
That the solutions should be implemented to decline air pollution has controversial. Several people believe that having an international car-free day is necessary method while others argue that there are some other ways for this issue. This essay will discuss both views.
To begin with, organizing a free-day car is illegible. It is seen clearly that there are a huge number of people over the world so it is difficult to require all people to avoid using car in certain day. In detailed, a lot of people use car as an only way to commute, therefore a car-free day may influence negatively on their daily works. Moreover, there are other vehicles which make air become pollution besides car. For instance, these transports such as bus, motorbike which use oil fuel to travel also discharge emissions into environment.
Besides, there are a variety of measures to tackle this problem. Firstly, the government should improve the standard of transportation system. For example, if the roads are widen, there are more spaces for vehicles to go on the road. The second solution I want to propose is that a nation ought to focus n investing advanced technology t create more vehicles which reduce the emissions. This limit the air pollution. Finally, encouraging the residents to use more public transports instead of private vehicles. Due to the fact that the less vehicles on the road, the less emissions are be discharged into atmosphere.
In conclusion, carrying out an international car-free day is a good method, however some other ways should be implemented contemporary to reduce the pollution of air.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple believe that having an international car-free day is necessary method while o...
^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e others argue that there are some other ways for this issue. This essay will di...
^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgue that there are some other ways for this issue. This essay will discuss both...
^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'widened'.
Suggestion: widened
...n system. For example, if the roads are widen, there are more spaces for vehicles to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...vate vehicles. Due to the fact that the less vehicles on the road, the less emission...
^^^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun emissions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...that the less vehicles on the road, the less emissions are be discharged into atmosp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...les on the road, the less emissions are be discharged into atmosphere. In conc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09056603774 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84403155502 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592452830189 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9027426757 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3125 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301546388601 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892331371707 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110204616909 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2194200021 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122003055005 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.