Some people think that international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution others think that there are some other ways.
In recent years it is considered that the efficient way of decreasing air pollution is implementing international car-free days, however, others believe that there are several alternative ways. From my perspective, I have the notion that the government should set certain rules those are in favour of mitigating air contamination.
On the one hand, declaring the international car-free days and making people not to drive in these days aren't advantageous way so as to minimize the air pollution since it is a short time contribution. People drive their private cars after specific days I'm which they are not allowed to. This means air pollution still continues to increase. They keep impacting on the environment negatively while they drive, as a consequence, this action accelerates the contamination of air.
On the other hand, government should be in charge of reducing air pollution by commencing to set stringent rules for society. Government should put driving limitations on every individual who has a private car. They should be driving their cars in emergency cases only without driving it to everywhere having no purpose. Moreover, the government should increase the prices of fuels. The number of car drivers steadily starts to decrease and it will definetely minimize the risk of pollution.
In conclusion, I believe that the government should take the authority to deal with this action with considering alternative ways as long as they are willing to save the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...aking people not to drive in these days arent advantageous way so as to minimize the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ve in these days arent advantageous way so as to minimize the air pollution since it is ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... their private cars after specific days Im which they are not allowed to. This mea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31223628692 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05903972048 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586497890295 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.355628552 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.916666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227915663733 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838711103654 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855651838857 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133490613886 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772428591521 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.