Some people think it is acceptable to use animal for the benefits of humans Other people think it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think it is acceptable to use animal for the benefits of humans. Other people think it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

For thousands of years, animals and human beings have established a complicated and magical relationship. While some people deem that humans should not exploit animals and invade animal rights for selfish purposes, I believe it is necessary to utilize animals properly and it is impossible to completely cut down human dependence on animals.

People argue that it is wrong to utilize animals for various reasons. There is no doubt that overexploitation of animals is harmful to both sides. We can see this when endangered species are dying away due to excessive hunting and other human activities. Furthermore, it is morally wrong to kill wild animals for entertainment or profit. Humans do not have the right to disrespect any other lives on earth.

However, a strong argument can also be made from the opposite position. Scientifically and naturally, it is the rule of nature for dominant species to make use of the other species. Therefore, it is natural for people to kill animals for food, research and other purposes. In another aspect, animals have indeed contributed a lot to human development. One great contribution they made lies in the development of medicines - new drugs are tested on animals, thus ensuring its safety and effectiveness for human use. For human beings, the significant benefits and convenience brought by animals can hardly be given up.

In summary, although hunting wild animals and killing them for fun or for their expensive furs is cruel and unnecessary, there still exists certain necessities for human beings to use animals. Human survival and development is closely reliant on animals.

Votes
Average: 4.6 (6 votes)

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'in summary', 'no doubt']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244827586207 0.247107183377 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.158620689655 0.155533422707 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.124137931034 0.0946595960268 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0551724137931 0.0501214627716 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0413793103448 0.0437548338989 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106896551724 0.122226691241 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0413793103448 0.0403226058552 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.92099362082 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0379310344828 0.0326793684256 116% => OK
Particles: 0.00689655172414 0.00163938923432 421% => OK
Determiners: 0.051724137931 0.0861772015684 60% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0137931034483 0.021408717616 64% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00344827586207 0.011925033212 29% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1630.0 1933.35771543 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 316.048096192 83% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19771863118 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20517956788 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395437262357 0.374742101984 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315589353612 0.28420135186 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.190114068441 0.203846283523 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125475285171 0.137316102897 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92099362082 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.037074148 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593155893536 0.56093040696 106% => OK
Word variations: 62.1911910434 60.7387585426 102% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.5333333333 20.7743622355 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8336860056 49.517814964 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 127.492653851 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7743622355 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.814263465372 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 49.0922686946 49.1944974215 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.54054054054 1.69124875643 91% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.52818502299 0.332605444948 159% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107844292096 0.102741220458 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.080634462646 0.0668466124924 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528862947921 0.534860350844 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164792515574 0.148594505496 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208016851453 0.134430193775 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115088763375 0.0742795772207 155% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.383828514471 0.324371583561 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0103836866016 0.0638462369009 16% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367900298054 0.228012699653 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624385092546 0.058150111329 107% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.68436873747 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 5.90881763527 51% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.5751503006 272% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 1.9629258517 204% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.