Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, the issue of whether it is better for a country to purchase foreign movies or to create domestic ones remains a source of controversy. From my perspective, I personally believe that both types of movies are equally important to a country’s culture.
On the one hand, there are various reason why I support the view that a country with a variety of foreign movies and TV shows could be clearly beneficial in some peripheral views. Firstly, watchers are more likely to experience many great storylines of many international movies that are rarely seen in local films. As a result, local residents could have their minds broaden positively and movie directors can catch up with the latest trend of film procedure in other countries. Secondly, local citizens might adopt many reasonable habits and traditions of other countries deliberately through watching TV programmes to enhance their social system in terms of behavior and viewpoint. In fact, this could create a diversity of culture and customs in a specific land such as USA.
On the one hand, I also believe that local movies have positive impacts on its cinema goers. First and foremost, film made by local citizens would help to preserve traditions and customs of their own culture. For example, many Vietnamese TV programmes remind young generations of how people celebrate Lunar New Year which is the most important public holiday in Asian countries. Another rationale is that these regional movies are believed to the reservoir of the glorious past of a nation. Philosophically speaking, like a person clings to the past to reflect, views the present to enjoy and contemplates the future, a movie itself entails an inextricable link of these three times axes to revise, thrive and fly.
In conclusion, from my perspective, I find that it is important for a country to impose local and international films at the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the past to reflect, views the present to enjoy and contemplates the future, a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, mind you, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07936507937 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84220787921 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590476190476 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.526786663 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215842236444 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719497946576 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047785135747 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131845391427 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046141640498 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.