Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Other think than it is better to produce these locally.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Never have environmental concerns gone as viral as they do now. It is argued that environmental issues fail to be tackled on an individual scale, they should rather be solved exclusively by authorities and broad corporations. In my opinion, I partially agree with the given assertion, as both can do their best to ameliorate environmental degradation.
To commence with, recycling can be the only way for individuals to care about the surroundings. More precisely, individuals should be encouraged to recycle their waste after using them for their own beneIt is considered by some people that for a state's civilization it is momentous to introduce outlandish cinema as well as TV programmes whilst other disagree and think that locally television broadcasting are better. There are valid opinions on both sides, which l will consider now.
On the one hand, some people feel that to introduce outlandish culture via TV which can help to recognise about others states is more useful. This is important for broaden inhabitant's horizon about foreign traditional culture. For instance, a large majority of youngsters interested in others lifestyle and learn their languages such as Korean, English, Turkish, Russian and other. And foreign movies help them in spiritual development at an important stage.
On the other hand, though one major benefit of local movie and TV programmes are that being in full in their native traditional cultivation as well as bring example to their life only on the strength of their country's culture. This can lead to them develop theirs own, but also separate from world's news and theirs mentalism.
Talking everything into account, l feel that the best way is that keep balance between foreign and local movies in television broadcasting, because it gives a wide range to choose from, to ensure their interest is high.
fit. In this way, wastage is averted from being disposed of into the sea or the need for landfills will be eliminated, which preserves arable lands against soil erosion. So, not only governments, but also people themselves are able to take steps against environmental problems.
However, governments and companies can combat environmental pollution on a greater scale. For instance, laws regarding environmental preservation should be implemented by governments in order to make it mandatory for everyone to save the environment. When it comes to companies, they must voluntarily cut down on the amount of waste they get rid of and turn to alternative sources of energy such as windmills. Gradually, law-abiding companies and governments will make their enormous contributions to the environment.
In conclusion, as long as the assistance of individuals, governments as well as companies is involved, environmental concerns will then be avoided. Therefore, a balanced view is presented above. It is predicted that if environmental taint is escaped at all costs, a safe future will be created for many people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'states'' or 'state's'?
Suggestion: states'; state's
...is considered by some people that for a states civilization it is momentous to introdu...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al development at an important stage. On the other hand, though one major bene...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fit
...rom, to ensure their interest is high. fit. In this way, wastage is averted from b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2505.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 471.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31847133758 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07353423017 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552016985138 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9818855169 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.863636364 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4090909091 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192536473318 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514807452194 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529720539089 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839532652811 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686208206183 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.