Entertainment sources such as movies and TV shows are making influence on everyone’s lifestyle. While some feel that every nation must have its own movie industry, I, however, side with those who feel international movies can enhance living style of any country.
On the one side, supporters of own TV industry for a country believes that if their locals watch any TV programmes of other areas, it can result in loss of heritage. For example, in India, many Indians despite having Hindi as national language, watching English shows and following international culture. Owing to this, many of the Indians seems to lossing their own culture. Thus, it is argued that international movies are the root cause for heritage loss of a country.
On the other side, I strongly believe that imported movies and films can help the locals of a nation by giving them an opportunity to learn multitude of cultures under a roof. In other words, they don’t need to take extra classes to learn internationally known languages such as English, French, as they can get its taste by watching their favourite shows. Moreover, by watching TV shows, many youngsters can learn about foreign languages and lifestyles, which might increase their chance of getting a lucrative job not only locally but internationally. Both of these factors directly or indirectly contributes to strengthen the cultural values of a nation.
In conclusion, although the chances of lossing a culture is high if a country doesn’t broadcast local films, I firmly believe that international trends can be learned by watching their TV programmes and it could widen job market for talented locals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an enhance living style of any country. On the one side, supporters of own TV in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13703703704 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86994978998 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607407407407 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3640386147 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.090909091 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181983060998 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734927472097 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466760032835 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109387462813 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218877010647 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.