Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about which type of sport is particularly better for participants. While people believe that team sports have more advantages, I would argue that playing personal sports is a better option.
There are more benefits of playing team sports. Firstly, players have to cooperate together with others on one team, so they can improve their teamwork skills. For examples, players in a team have to work together to put the ball into the opponents’ basket on a basketball match. Secondly, playing teamwork sports is a chance to meet new persons and make friend with them, they can help their friends to improve playing skills on practical time, spend free time to talk about the sport they are playing and to go out for relaxation with others. On the other hand, if players on a team do not know teammates well, they can not assist others well so they will not have chances to win any game they play.
On the next view, I’m going to explain why playing personal sports is better. Although not depending on teammates, players who play tennis, swimming, etc... can show all their personal skills on their matches. For instance, when people want to win games, they just focus on the opponent and do all their best although there is no one for they rely on. Secondly, they have more time to develop their personal skills with the tutor. Because of individual sports so they have not to spend their time to develop teamwork skills.
In conclusion, while people think cooperating sports brings more advantages, I still believe that participants should certain to spend time for personal sports.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94252873563 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47669070708 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513409961686 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6907826899 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1428571429 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158260465333 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730038037414 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622021548129 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13420722371 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636366616675 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.