Some people think that it should be compulsory for people to retake their driving test every 5 years. What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this?
It is argued that it should be mandatory to take again driving exam every 5 years. This essay will firstly discuss issue of new traffic rules as one of the main advantages of this, and secondly, outline necessary activities for doing this as one of the disadvantages.
One of the principal advantages is that there is lots of new traffic rules are introduced by the Government and they should be well-known for all people. Unfortunately, nowadays not every person knows, where information about new laws and rules can be found, but should follow them like a participant of traffic. Introduction of compulsory retaking driving test can solve this problem. Moreover, if people had to chance to communicate with traffic cops every 5 years, it would probably decrease the number of car accidents.
On the other hand, the main disadvantage is the cost of activities for retaking test. Every year more and more people take drive exam and receive a driving license. That means, for creating a new scheme of retaking test, existing form of driving school should be reorganized, because they physically can not accept an increasing number of retaking drivers. This results in significant rising cost of test, however it can help to create new workplaces.
In conclusion, the benefits such as well-known traffic rules, new workplaces, communication with examiner must be weighed against the drawbacks, such as cost of the retaking test. Overall, advantages outweigh the disadvantages, because they have more positive effect on the traffic situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are lots'?
Suggestion: there are lots
...One of the principal advantages is that there is lots of new traffic rules are introduced by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itive effect on the traffic situations.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23293172691 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91252998647 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562248995984 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0945343273 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.583333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366344827559 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134414596096 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593591121541 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21878015647 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826869279331 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.