Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel, but others claim that animals are a necessary part of a diet. What is your opinion.
Animal slaughter has been highlighted as an emerging issue, sparking global outcry for its violation of animal’s rights. Despite the suggestion emphasizing the cruelty fo animal killing, the essence of animals in humans’ dietary plans are pronounced.
It is true that animal meat is an indispensable part of humans’ diet. First, animal-sourced products contain numerous nutrients, which could never be found on vegetables. The consumption of such substances would prevent individuals from suffering inadequate nutrition, ensuring their health balance and stability. In addition, in many nations, especially developing ones, the weather conditions and soil quality are not suitable for growing crops, leading to serious food securities. Consequently, citizens have to rely on animal-origin food, which is conducive to the uptake of enough calorie for the body function, averting the possibilities of starvation.
Additionally, The cruelty of animal slaughter could be eliminated with better governmental supervision. In fact many official authorities have enacted humane killing law, providing guideline for slaughter and animal processing factories. For example, in Vietnam, the “ no killing while conscious” regulation has been imposed, providing the usage of anesthesia, which could cause animals’ instant unconsciousness followed by rapid death without regaining consciousness, thereby reducing the suffering and agony to the minimal level.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that animals hold significant role in humans’ diet due to their positive implications on physical health. Therefore, for the well-being purpose, If official authorities could ensure the human killing on animals, the ensuing pain and distress would be considerably eliminated.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.196 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32391335627 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2614803099 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.083333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242947032759 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970566683719 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490324256141 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154935170866 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325123108568 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.68 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.45 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.