In modern age with the development of high technologies the main purpose of museums remains unclear. Some people believe that museums are the institution which provides an opportunity to gain knowledge, while others assume that it serves the amusement needs. The justice of both claims will be observed in the essay.
Firstly, it is considered that people visiting museums mainly to learn something new and that this facility is a powerful instrument of education. For instance, Moscow Paleontological Museum is well-known for the great number of provided audio and video-resources, lectures and exhibitions. Those, who visit it, in fact gain a vast amount of opportunities to study the history of our planet and about creatures that live here now or lived thousands and millions years ago. Thus, the advantage of museums like the educational centers can be seen clearly.
On the other side, the advancement of digital technologies has made a museum the place where people can have a bit fun too. Certain people even argue that entertainment had become its main function. The St. Petersburg Darwin Museum of Nature, for example, decreased the quantity of literature and texts that visitors have to read and replaced it with illustrations, videos and holograms. This way, in one hand, helps to keep visitors stimulated and entertained while, in other hand, offers a possibility of deeper understanding of the historical, cultural or scientific topics the museum have. Therefore, the usage of hi-tech in museum helps the visitors to focus on information without getting bored and exhausted.
To sum up, both of the provided opinions contain the grain of the truth, but I definitely agree with the overwhelming benefit of museum as a studying facility, while its entertaining purpose is secondary and only helps visitors to gain more information in easier ways. Thus, it is believed that museums will be used mainly for this aim in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21656050955 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96084499892 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595541401274 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9532568813 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292472689584 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983953425028 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514916667641 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185354140982 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533251897633 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.