Some people think the news has no connection to people's lives, so it is a waste of time to read the news in the newspaper and watch television news programmes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed to be wasteful to either read printed news or watch news broadcasts due to its irrelevance to people’s lives. Although this proposal seems reasonable, I totally disagree with this view.
The media tend to focus on reporting the world situation and political problems which are somewhat unrelated to the life of ordinary people. For example, a blue-collar worker needs to focus on earning money/making a decent living; thus, the information in the news seems hardly significant. However, the relationship between news and their impacts on people are rarely perceived regardless of their jobs or ages. Informed of the war happening in some countries by watching news, travellers, for instance, can avoid these war-stricken/war-torn countries for the sake of securities.
Some compelling reasons for people to believe the daily news they watch or read will have considerable effects on their life can be taken into account. First, by staying up-to-date with the news, people can be aware of the surrounding world, which helps them behave more appropriately. Unbeknownst to the government's policies about COVID-19 and the social distancing strategy, for example, people may organize crowded parties, leading to far-reaching consequences. Another reason is that well-informed people can have a great opportunity to broaden their minds, supporting them in not only life but also jobs. In fact, people with news awareness are highly respected among their peers.
In conclusion, I would like to reaffirm that although some news in newspapers and information of TV programs seems trivial for some people, the benefits can be significant and undeniable
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'seems'.
Suggestion: hardly seems
...ving; thus, the information in the news seems hardly significant. However, the relationship ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47286821705 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09587791563 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.52113761 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283497100194 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110514817845 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826439303096 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182739292218 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486776860275 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.