Some people think that renewable energy sources like solar and wind power should replace fossil fuels such as coal and gas as soon as possible. Others think we should continue to use fossil fuels while it is still cheap to do so.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
According to the environmental concerns, a variety of renewable energy sources like solar and wind power is encouraged to replace the conventional energy sources of coal and gas promptly. However, the economic issues lead to the argument to keep utilizing these fossil fuels.
From the first point of view, shifting toward clean power is considered essential for environmentally-friendly and sustainable development. As a matter of fact, burning coal or natural gas to generate energy emits considerable heat and carbon dioxide, which consequently increases the global temperature at an unprecedented rate and causes air pollution. Furthermore, since fossil fuels require an extensive time to naturally replenish, which may take up to thousands or even millions of years, keep abusing these energy sources may drive them to their extreme. Thereby, converting to green alternatives at the earliest opportunity can avoid the fossil fuels being run off.
On the contrary, the financial effectiveness of renewable energy sources must also takes under concern. It is argued that investing in these alternatives put a heavy burden on the government and companies in purchasing and developing new equipment and facilities for harnessing solar, wind, or hydroelectric power. Thus, it can be seen that the utilization of solar panels or wind towers for producing energy in many developing countries is still immensely limited. According to this context, coal, natural gas, or oil are still believed to continue dominating energy production in the upcoming future.
From my perspective, I believe that shifting towards using alternative energy is worthwhile due to the great benefits it brings. In terms of cost, even though renewable energy sources require a huge amount of initial funding, the facilities can be used in a long term. Thus, the expenditure will be more affordable and offer a lot of potential savings over time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this energy' or 'these energies'?
Suggestion: this energy; these energies
...or even millions of years, keep abusing these energy sources may drive them to their extreme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, thus, while, as to, as a matter of fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44966442953 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16811936584 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624161073826 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8782506488 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261026815285 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839236139816 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557237603898 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159569128178 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653110214354 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.