Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individual and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Social networking sites have been highlighted as an emerging issue, capturing significant public attention. Given the suggestion emphasizing negative implications, I partially agree.
On the one hand, it is true that the usage of social networks could be fraught with many pitfalls. First, since users can customize their profiles on social networks based on their personal preferences, these fake profiles could be purposed for criminal purposes, posing as serious safety threats to coerced individuals. For example, dating app users, especially young ones could fall prey to sexual predators, masquerading as matching partners through fake profiles and portrait display images, thereby making victims susceptible to sexual battery or even homicide. Second, by using social network sites, users could contact, interact and intermingle with many other peers of different nationalities and cultures. This means that people’s vulnerability to the exposure and indoctrination to extremist beliefs and fundamentalist religions could ensue, increasing affected users’s tendencies to commit terrorism acts, doing serious harm to societies.
On the other hand, social sites could have many benefits to justify the downsides. First, using online social networks is one of the most efficient and inexpensive ways to communicate and interact with others. Before the appearance of social websites, delivering a message from one location to another would require physical travels, costing unnecessary time, effort and money. From the societal perspective, due to social networking’s characteristic of wireless connection, many government and private funded educational programmes with qualified lecturers have been featured into many prevalent social networks such as Facebook and Instagram. Subsequently, individuals, especially those with little accessibility to educational institutions could be equipped with academic and practical knowledge and occupational skills for specific job specifications, making their increased employment prospects an inevitable product, ensuring the betterment of educated workforce for societies.
In conclusion, I believe that social networks have both advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, it is individuals’ responsibility to manage the proper usage for their best interests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun government seems to be countable; consider using: 'many governments'.
Suggestion: many governments
... characteristic of wireless connection, many government and private funded educational programm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.28348909657 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28715502319 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647975077882 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.9823613952 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.071428571 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166724981286 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697692838219 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547935072527 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122061789936 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313029267009 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.31 50.2224549098 30% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.44 12.4159519038 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.47 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.