Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individual and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Social networking sites have brought significant changes to our habits in recent years. While it is argued by many that social networking sites bring people closer, there remains some disagreement as to whether the overall effect of this invention has been positive or negative. OveralI, it is my personal view that the benefits of social networking sites far outweigh theirs drawbacks. These benefits are twofold.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that social networking sites bring people closer. It cannot be denied that together with internet, social sites facilitate the way we communicate. Thanks to social sites like facebook or instagram, we can nowadays get through to relatives far away just by a click of a button. No matter how far the distance is, we can update what our beloved ones are like in the fastest way. Even though the problem of private information leakage is real, it can be avoided by setting privacy function available on any social networking sites.
Equally importantly, particularly in the era of big information like these days, when the speed of spreading information is extremely high, social networking sites become a pivotal tool in doing business. Instead of using traditional ways of marketing which is not only costly but also ineffective, marketing and advertising by social networking sites constitutes a perfect substitute for advertising on TV. The more social networking users are, the more viral the information is, which consequently increases the effect of marketing dramatically.
By way of conclusion, I once again affirm my position that social networking sites have more positive influences rather than detrimental impacts on individual as well as society. In years to come, I do believe that social networking sites should be encouraged to be widely used together with training on how to use them properly to minimize the risk of social isolation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...closer, there remains some disagreement as to whether the overall effect of this invention ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...lable on any social networking sites. Equally importantly, particularly in the era of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, well, while, as to, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24836601307 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90530779133 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584967320261 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5211468373 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274466436814 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975446711527 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553430163535 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173694601548 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433060109131 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.