Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned from TV as well as from international sporting competitions. To what extent do you agree?
These few decades have seen an upsurge in the popularity of violent sports such as boxing, martial arts… which has caused a lot of arguments among the society. From my point of view, I wholehearted believe that the idea of imposing a ban on this genre of sports should take effect as soon as possible due to its potential benefits.
First and foremost, this policy will definitely make an enormous contribution to the cognitive development of human beings especially children accompanied by juvenility. When these rough sports have a wide coverage on many TV channels and international competitions, people will be negatively exerted on the grounds that they are easily obsessed with these actions and likely to idolize along with emulate the fighters. This will lead to an alarming rate of offender especially young felonies as well as a significant intensifying in social evils.
Another noteworthy point is that people have to suffer from the high risks of not only health problems and injuries but also demise if they are exposed themselves to these brutal sports. For instance, in boxing, players are forced to take powerful blows with the aim of knocking out his opponent and winning the game, which makes them find it much easier to get injured, disabled or even dead after the match. As a result, there is a likelihood is that they may have to struggle with more health problems than others when they get older and retire.
To sum up, I totally claim that there should be a veto on these violent sports in both TV programs and cross-border contests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
.... From my point of view, I wholehearted believe that the idea of imposing a ban on this...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificant intensifying in social evils. Another noteworthy point is that people ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90943396226 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65563876126 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637735849057 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.6456526971 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.555555556 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180287502528 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677492020088 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054961472853 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110628506728 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503439086577 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.