History can be used as a guideline for the future. We can change our next step according to our previous mistakes. There are two schools of thought on learning the past, while some believes that there is no use of old values in our present lives, other thinks that history is an important resource for understanding the individuals life. I, however, tend to agree with the formar notion. In this essay, I will highlight my viewpoints and try to provide sound reasoning for my claims.
There are multifarious reasons behind the fact that we cannot learn from the past. First and foremost, currently we do not have that much time to evaluate the human's life. In other words, people are dealing with work-life balance and the past resources do not hold any important value for this generation. Secondly, as we are living in the era of technology, individuals should focus on learning the technical skills rather that the historical aspects of human's life. Even though the past culture has some valuable informations, it cannot help us to earn regular bread and butter. Thus, instead of digging up the historical aspects, we should learn the hot technological skills to sustain in this competitive world. Finally, people should look forward. Despite of the mammoth innovations in the past, we should not live in the past and therefore, we should occupied with progressive thoughts. Hence, past life has no values.
Conversely, some people argue for the different notion. Firstly, history can guide us. To be precise, we can rectify ourselves when we learn something from our past mistakes and this is very helpful for our futures. Additionally, individuals can learn leadership qualities from the past people. For instance, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King were the pioneer of leadership and if anyone studies their activities, it may be helpful for their current organization. Furthermore, history pushes people to break the limit. I would like to cite an example. Every sportsman is competiting with the world records, which was achieved in the past. Thus, history holds valuable information about the human's life.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate my opinion by saying that, although we cannot ignore our history, it is better to focus on the current needs and thus we must cope up with the progressive speed instead of the past lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...mportant resource for understanding the individuals life. I, however, tend to agree with th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...not have that much time to evaluate the humans life. In other words, people are dealin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 692, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ry holds valuable information about the humans life. To conclude, I would like to r...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04627249357 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69050862204 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552699228792 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.9672523297 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7916666667 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2083333333 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180861773595 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577897985596 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047067135476 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106263005613 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455071292492 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.