Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Throughout the past, parents opt to sending their children into education system at school for reason enhancing necessary knowledge. Generally, teachers have spent much more time with students almost 9 hours per day with training academic contents. However, some people believe that teachers should not guide young people about mores and ethics. I strongly disagree with this assertion to some extent as in my opinion which I will discuss now.
On the one hand, firstly, it is an undeniable fact that modern society faces corruption which widely relates to people with high education. While math, science or even languages skills are concentrated, the problem of lacking community conscious might be ignored. As far as the government is concerned, this deteriorated human's quality would be a critical impact. Then corporating civic duty in curriculum could coach juveniles in the right way and, as a result, the increasing number of bully in primary and high schools definitely decline. According to a further benefit, children learn cheating examination is illegal activities which are a chain effect to all parts of education.
On the other hand, opponents argue that certain bias viewpoint or personal belief could be released to peers. For example, if teacher resist administration system of government, complains might be pass to young age students who have low experience to judge what is right or wrong. Moreover, the meaning of good behave for each people is probably different, if they hold this and use it in their family, misunderstanding between offspring and adults might happen aggressively.
In conclusion, the merits of guideline of good or bad for students have overshadowed their demerits. Personally, this task is not only teacher duty but also individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cheat'.
Suggestion: to cheat
...ng to a further benefit, children learn cheating examination is illegal activities which...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chain effect to all parts of education. On the other hand, opponents argue that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35587188612 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87116061516 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683274021352 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3499398449 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231370760411 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668716190343 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586338994321 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130798640129 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611213961062 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.