The fact has shown that some adolescents are spending their leisure time on helping their local communities without payments. Lots of people hold the belief that it would be beneficial to themselves and the whole society as well. In my point of view, I completely disagree with this opinion because of some following its disadvantages.
First of all, it is not proper and unfair for students to be forced to do unpaid works after school. Teenagers are at the age of learning and they have to meet their deadlines for their homework. As a result, they should get their priority right which is to pay full attention to their study instead of taking care of others' responsibilities. Besides, youngsters need comprehensive developments by playing sports or doing other extra-curriculum activities, so if they take time out to do unrelated works, there will not time left for these things.
Nevertheless, society would not have merited by using students as a workforce. In fact, if they do not focus on their studying to become good citizens, their countries will not have well-qualified employees in the long run. For instance, in a developing nation like Vietnam, there has been being a huge number of children who have to make for living after class to help their families. Therefore, these students could not meet the requirement of contemporary industries in terms of skillfulness as well as occupational disciplines.
In conclusion, I do not share the view with some reasons which I mentioned above. The choice of whether helping the local or not belongs to the young, but it is suggested that adults should not ask them to do works which are their duties.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97491039427 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95225209776 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4018352749 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338003644219 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108043109909 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435236441742 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192427271603 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427931711163 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.