Some people think that there should be some strict controls about the noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Some people argue that some essential measures should be implemented to control noises. Others, however, assert that they have the right to make noise if they want to. Both of the views will be fully analyzed as follows.
In the first place, there is no denying that there are a number of reasons why the government should impose some laws to strictly control the amount of noise produced. The first reason is that too much noise can have negative impacts on people’s health. For example, some people may find it harder to fall asleep, even have a headache if these intrusive sounds occur on a frequent basis. Additionally, the productivity of work and study might be lessened as a result of noise. For example, students at school cannot fully focus on their studies due to the noise coming from vehicles in the street.
On the other hand, it can hardly be denied that people have the freedom to make noise as they like. Firstly, creating noise is sometimes considered a type of recreational activity. A lot of people say that they feel more relax and comfortable when listening to music or various activities while working or studying. Secondly, the development of noise-proof technology has enabled ppl to generate noises without disturbing others. Scientists have invented walls and windows that can eliminate the noise, which allows individuals to concentrate on their work. As a consequence, noise is no longer a serious obstacle.
All things considered, I find the former more convincing. This can be well illustrated by the fact that limiting the level of noise will help residents to have a better life although the noise is sometimes not a big issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96085409253 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67078946167 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612099644128 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8437920403 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.125 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343719613756 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105791471961 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785937103576 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215519874801 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109955516859 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.