Some people think the typical teaching of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050. Do you agree or disagree?
In this modern, technology has become more accessible for all purposes, which makes our lives easy as compared to the past. Some people think that there will not any classes exist in 2050 and traditional teaching methods will be vanish, while others not believe it would happen in the future. This essay will argue that why people do not give their agreement in the given argument and why I agree with the statement, all explanations described in the following paragraphs.
Education is necessary for everyone because it will help throughout time in humans’ lives. Indeed, there are numbers of people who agree that traditional teaching ways and classes are playing a vital role in life, students become more educated. Thus, they think the online class not good for their children, it harms the child’s brain and creates obstacles in developments. For example, many students agreed that online education methods not good for studies, they preferred going to the class is more beneficial in terms of practical, theatrical, and calculations. This was found in a survey in 2020. Therefore, physical education is beneficial because students become smarter and it does not damage mental health.
However, other people think that traditional methods of education and classes will vanish because technologies make education easier and understandable by using ai and robots, which is accessible by login into the browser rather than going to classes, teachers will be replaced by robots and supercomputers, which are far better than humans. For instance, online education has become more popular since 1990 in many counties. Overall, online classes are easier for students, whereas children become more aware of the technology.
To conclude, traditional methods and classes provide better education to children, which are less effective than online education because it is understandable. In my words, in the future when online classes will replace all campus, it will be helpful for all nations and children. It makes it easier for children in many terms
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32208588957 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73831557039 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515337423313 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2906347484 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227651509744 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759810444312 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839227500358 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14843245516 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687102171054 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.