some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Do the benefits of its outweigh the problems ?
Inventing a new global language to be an excellent idea in order to ease the communication between the nations. In my opinion, there are several drawbacks of it as compare to benefits of implement new world-wide language. This essay would discuss some of the major problems of this concept with my point of view.
Admittedly, international language provide common medium for communication. Firstly, understanding and learning of the any language has been a popular problem for any people. Also, if new language will be invented than it will take more time because language development contain many things like words and grammatical rules. Hence, we can say that it is not a permanent solution.Secondly, Since many countries depend on tourism and people earn money by guiding local tour in native language of tourist, with common language skill they will lose their job and source of income. Hence, global language will produce many questions regarding employment. On basis on this argument I believe that there will be no significant impact by using this concept in future.
Although, common language has a great impact on globalization people, in order to understand language huge effort is required. The government should introduce international curriculum for new language in education sector and it will be difficult to higher authorities to regulate it. Also, students are already suffered in learning native and many other languages where new language enforces the enormous amount of burden on them. Consequently, education level would be deteriorated. Moreover, new language creates more issues for old-aged people. At age of 60 to 70 learning new language is very difficult and nearly impossible. Apart from that, if new language will employ in future than they are not able to talk in global language of world and creates more issue related to traveling and tourism.
To conclude, I firmly believe that introducing world-wide language have more shortcomings as compare to its benefits. However language conflict related problems will be solved, learning new language requires arduous effort of individuals and all people have not same ability to acquire new skill immediatly. Therefore, this is not clear solution for integrate whole world using same linguistic skill as a new language.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...wide language. This essay would discuss some of the major problems of this concept with my ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Secondly
...say that it is not a permanent solution.Secondly, Since many countries depend on tourism...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 750, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ignificant impact by using this concept in future. Although, common language has a gr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffered in learning native and many other languages where new language enforces th...
^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...hortcomings as compare to its benefits. However language conflict related problems will...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ame linguistic skill as a new language.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34986225895 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92917663151 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548209366391 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4960852739 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.210526316 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308779509138 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986734013157 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579754151163 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187745856015 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207447543644 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.