Job selection by young adults has become a matter of heated debate nowadays; while some people argues that parents are responsible to chose the job for them, others think that they have the autonomy to choose their carrier. This essay will discuss the both sides in detail and provde my personal opinion at the end.
According to the former view, the parents will choose best possible job for their kids. This argument might be based on the belief that, parents know the strength and weakness of their kids, so that their choices will be accurate. For example, the parents know what to do for a child proficient in mathematics, probably they will sent him for engeneering or accountancy. Similerly, child with other aptitudes, they will choose appropiate jobs. Secondly some parents have their ambitions on the children's job selections, therefore, they will prepare their kids according to the job's requirements.
The later team argues for the autonomy of children to chose their profession. Forcing someone to select inappropriate jobs or out of his taste will give adverse results, in addition pupil will feel that their decision making is by-passed by parents prejudices. Selecting a carrier without interest and ability to do this will make their professional life big failure. On the other hands, if the youth choses their desired proffession they can perform their best, which allow them to achieve success in their profession. For example many scientist had chosen their interested fields, irrespective of parents decision and succeeded in their life with glorious discoveries.
Overall, in my perspectives,decision making in selecting jobs should be done by the youth, so that there should be no force over the peopledge. Moreover, the person himself knows his strengths and weakness than his parents do, hence he can make the best selection.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... the both sides in detail and provde my personal opinion at the end. According to the former v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'choose the best'.
Suggestion: choose the best
...ng to the former view, the parents will choose best possible job for their kids. This argum...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to best', 'to well'
Suggestion: to best; to well
...he former view, the parents will choose best possible job for their kids. This argum...
^^^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'send'
Suggestion: send
...ient in mathematics, probably they will sent him for engeneering or accountancy. Sim...
^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al life big failure. On the other hands, if the youth choses their desired proffe...
^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many scientists'.
Suggestion: many scientists
...uccess in their profession. For example many scientist had chosen their interested fields, irr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , decision
...iscoveries. Overall, in my perspectives,decision making in selecting jobs should be done...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20066889632 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77003042112 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578595317726 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7737035105 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.071428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30479956977 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110627992451 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650546137619 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182031264256 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693078789154 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.