Some people want government to spend money on life on other planets. However, others think it is a waste of public money when the earth already has so many problems. Discuss both views and give you own opinion.
People have differing views with regard to the areas where the public money should be invested in. Some people argue the government should spend money on searching alien lives on other planets so that human beings may find alternative planets to live in the future. Others, however, oppose this view and believe there are more important concerns on Earth waiting to be addressed.
Supports believe that not only people’s everyday life but also the future of human race will therefore benefit from launching alien projects. It is a fact that practical technology has been advanced through space exploration. For instance, there are many inventions including pace makers and smoke detectors, which are lifesavers in people’s everyday life, are the by-products of space research. In addition, find a new planet with lives may ease people’s concern about energy depletion. Due to the significance of the growing vehicle numbers and the expansion of urbanisation, today’s demand for energy has increased on an unprecedented scale.
However, the opponents argue that the government should have more important concerns to mitigate the problems on Earth. There still are many people in many areas of the world who are suffering from disease, hunger and extreme poverty. The government has its moral obligation to prioritise the public money to be spent on freeing these people from suffering. By providing them a safety net, those people in need can be able to receive basic medical treatment, better education and more job opportunities.
In conclusion, while many people can benefit from the outcomes from alien life searching, more people can have a better life if the government can invest money in combating poverty. Therefore, I believe the government should give the financial prioritises to address the problems on the earth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38144329897 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82883208246 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1771132361 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2382675026 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785617498603 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559564675112 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152065243042 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644087105354 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.